A Rare Butterfly
GIUSEPPE
PENNISI was at La Scala
for the start of the new season in Milan
for the start of the new season in Milan
Teatro alla Scala's new season
traditionally opens on 7 December, when St Ambrose, the patron of Milan, is
celebrated with a holiday. The performance starts at
6pm with a gala evening — black
ties, long dresses,
high fashion, many
politicians, businessmen and money managers — followed by dinners. Normally,
the President of the Republic is in the royal box; this year he had to renounce
at the last moment due to the political crisis in Rome where the
Prime Minister had just resigned. As customary, the evening started with the
national anthem. I was in a comfortable orchestra seat.
In any way,
this 'season inauguration' was quite extraordinary. Usually either a new production of a
well-known title is selected, or rather the rediscovery of a forgotten opera. This year,
La Scala's
management and artistic direction proposed a
very well known opera, Puccini's Madama Butterfly, but in a version which is
very rarely heard: the version that failed, and was covered by boos, precisely
at La Scala on 17 February 1904, at its premiere. The fiasco was such that
Puccini and the authors of the libretto (Giuseppe Giacosa and Luigi Illica) revised
the opera mostly by making it a three act affair (instead of a two act opera
with a very long second part) and adding a remorse aria for the tenor — 'Addio
fiorito asil' — for a Brescia staging in
Fall 1904. More drastic changes were made
in 1906 when the opera reached the Parisian Théâtre des
Italiens. The 1906 version is the one normally performed. Occasionally, the
February 1904 version is shown in festival. Thus the 2016 St Ambrose
inauguration can be considered a festival evening.
What are the
main differences between the February 1904 version and the generally produced
1906 version? The 1904 version is made up of an introduction to Japan through
Western European eyes; there
is more than a bit of a racism: Cio-Cio-san is a young prostitute
(due to the political suicide of her father and the
impoverishment of her family), her
uncles and the rest of her family are caricatures, and Pinkerton is a young American who wants
to have fun-and-games. The long second act is a tragedy. Musically, the first
one is almost a descriptive comedy, while the
second shows some slight influences of the Second Viennese School (then
starting). It contains dissonances worthy of Richard Strauss, and quite
a bit of post-romanticism (eg in the intermezzo) and even
chit-chat music. Most of these elements are also in
the 1906 version but softened so as not to be so prominent.
Under the baton of Riccardo Chailly, the
orchestra was showing the innovations (for the time) and beauties of the original score, especially
in the second part.
This was
helped by the staging of Alvis Hermanis and his 'creative team' — Leila Fteita,
Kristine Jurjäne, Gleb Filshtinsky, Alla Sigalova and Ineta Sipunova for,
respectively, sets, costumes, lighting, choreography and video. Their
references are not Kabuki theatre, as some
reviewers have said, but European paintings about Japan
from the late eighteenth century and early nineteenth century. This is a very
good solution.
Uruguayan dramatic soprano Maria José
Siri was excellent in the title role. She has a perfect emission
and was really moving in the second part when she has to leave the most
precious thing of her life — her son —
to Pinkerton's American wife. There were
a lot of expectations for the American tenor Bryan Hymel, well known for his belcanto
roles; he is a traditional Pinkerton.
Carlos Álvarez is a very experienced Sharpless. Annalisa
Stroppa is a high impact Suzuki.
There were
fifteen minutes of ovations at the end of the performance.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento